Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

halp with gap, just so I know it's there

Is there a number that determines what page you'll get porn on when you search for seemingly innocent terms? I just searched for hijab for good pictures to use in my senior seminar presentation, and page four featured a nearly nude woman. Then page five featured a woman touching herself while wearing hijab. No, I'm not using either one of those.

Variables would include controversy factor, number of people who fetishize what you're searching for, and the probability of porn already out there featuring it.

Bonus points if you have some type of safe search on.

Also, while trying to download the GAP (no, not the clothes) to Yoshi in the library earlier, I got this error.

C:\Documents and Settings\MYNAME\My Documents\gap4r4p12-win.zip could not be saved, because the source file could not be read.

Try again later, or contact the server administrator.

And I tried everything, even FTP-ing it. I would download it to Dora, but these days I'm on Yoshi much more often. If all else fails I'll see if I can dump it on Thawspace somewhere on campus.

(Yes, this is important. That group demands classifying, damnit, and all I can do at the moment is eliminate the ones I know it isn't. Which is... four of them. Eleven more to go.)


( 6 comments — Leave a comment )
Apr. 19th, 2009 03:59 am (UTC)
Hijab porn is the best
Apr. 19th, 2009 04:15 am (UTC)
That reminds me of what a Muslim friend says in reaction to one of the Stupid Questions Muslims Get Asked.

Idiot: So do you leave it on when you have sex?
Her (looking completely serious): Yes. Everything else goes off.
Apr. 19th, 2009 08:27 am (UTC)
Apparently true by the sounds of your 2nd pic!
Apr. 21st, 2009 04:04 pm (UTC)
Now, if you can find some method for finding said number, I'd be proud to refer to the Sujin Number. (It's like the Hartogs number, but better)
Apr. 23rd, 2009 02:04 am (UTC)
I definitely read that as the Hot Dog number at first.

Also, I'm completely serious about figuring that out, but other things in that thing called Life are getting in the way. Who needs one of those?
Apr. 23rd, 2009 03:57 am (UTC)
Now, I ponder; Could we form some characteristic function, in which the more innuendo a word has associated with it, or more scandal with it increases it's number. So you could just make the characteristic function such that it's subadditive (I don't think you need pure additivity), and finite. I want to say sigma finite, so given any infinite string of words, it'll give a finite result.
( 6 comments — Leave a comment )